What is the better alternative to UUID?

    April 10, 2025
    5 min read
    uuid
    identifiers
    alternatives
    performance
    best-practices

    UUIDs are great—but they’re not perfect.

    They’re long, not human-friendly, and their randomness (especially in UUIDv4) doesn’t play well with databases that rely on sorted inserts. So what are the better alternatives to UUIDs?

    Let’s walk through three strong contenders: ULID, KSUID, and NanoID.


    🔹 1. ULID – Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier

    ULIDs aim to solve the problems UUIDs struggle with:

    • Sortable: They start with a timestamp
    • Readable: Base32 encoding is friendly for humans
    • Uniqueness: Uses 80 bits of randomness after the time component

    Example:

    code
    01H7CWRK9XWXYAYFB6V4YX99JD

    🔧 Use Cases:

    • Database IDs that need to be ordered by creation time
    • Systems where readability matters
    • Distributed systems needing collision resistance

    Pros:

    • Sortable (unlike UUIDv4)
    • URL-safe and compact
    • Widely implemented across languages

    Cons:

    • Slightly longer than UUIDs
    • Time component can reveal creation time (use cautiously for privacy)

    🔹 2. KSUID – K-Sortable Unique Identifier

    KSUIDs were built by Segment to be like UUIDv1, but better.

    • 128 bits long (like UUID)
    • First 32 bits are a timestamp (seconds since epoch)
    • Remaining 96 bits are random

    Example:

    code
    0o5Fs0EELR0fUjHjbCnEtdUwQb5

    🛠️ Use Cases:

    • Event logging
    • Systems that need time-based ordering
    • Anywhere UUIDv1 was used—but with improved safety

    Pros:

    • Encodes time, helpful for logs and analytics
    • Sorts chronologically
    • No MAC address leaks like UUIDv1

    Cons:

    • Larger than NanoID or shortened UUIDs
    • Not as readable as ULID

    🔹 3. NanoID – The Customizable ID Generator

    NanoID is small, secure, and incredibly flexible:

    • Default size is 21 characters
    • Customizable alphabet and length
    • Collision-resistant even with shorter strings

    Example:

    code
    V1StGXR8_Z5jdHi6B-myT

    ⚙️ Use Cases:

    • Client-side generation
    • Short URLs
    • Secure IDs in front-end apps

    Pros:

    • Tiny footprint (~130 bytes in JS)
    • URL-safe and compact
    • Cryptographically secure

    Cons:

    • Not inherently sortable
    • No embedded timestamp or metadata

    📊 Feature Comparison

    FeatureUUIDv4ULIDKSUIDNanoID
    Sortable
    Human-readable⚠️
    Compact❌ (36 chars)✅ (26 chars)✅ (27 chars)✅ (21+ chars)
    Time-encoded
    Privacy-safe⚠️ (timestamp)⚠️ (timestamp)

    🤔 Which One Should You Use?

    • Want ordering + readability? Go ULID.
    • Need database-friendly IDs with timestamp? Try KSUID.
    • Need tiny, flexible, front-end-safe IDs? Use NanoID.
    • Still using UUIDv4? It’s fine, but not optimal for sorted data or readability.

    ✅ Final Thoughts

    UUIDs served us well—but modern systems need better ergonomics, sorting, and performance. Thankfully, tools like ULID, KSUID, and NanoID offer strong, practical alternatives.

    Choose your ID wisely—it’s more than a string; it’s the foundation of how your system works, scales, and communicates.


    Next up: a benchmark showdown of UUID vs ULID vs NanoID in Python, Node.js, and Go. Don’t miss it!

    Generate Your Own UUIDs

    Ready to put this knowledge into practice? Try our UUID generators:

    Generate a Single UUID

    Create a UUID with our fast, secure generator

    Bulk UUID Generator

    Need multiple UUIDs? Generate them in bulk

    Summary

    This article explores modern alternatives to UUIDs, including ULIDs, KSUIDs, and NanoIDs. It compares them in terms of readability, performance, and suitability for different use cases.

    TLDR;

    UUIDs are popular, but they're not always the best fit—especially when readability, sortability, or storage efficiency matter.

    Key points to remember:

    • ULIDs are sortable and readable
    • KSUIDs embed time and randomness, ideal for distributed systems
    • NanoIDs are compact, customizable, and collision-resistant

    The “best” alternative depends on your priorities: performance, uniqueness, or user-friendliness.

    Cookie Consent

    We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By accepting, you agree to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.